17th- watched painted veil today. paused several times, which is what i do when i cant contain bhalo-laga, my brain starts over-working itself into a story of its own- when i’ve blown off the steam, i come back… … i dont think it disturbs the movie. it lets me watch it without being overwhelmed…
anyway, i’m having second thoughts now. first of all, there should have been a LOT more of edward norton. i just got glimpses of the insides of the character and how he may be shy and conservative and awkward but still attractive… well, it just wasn’t enough.
plus, there were factors of ‘disbelief’- like, why did ‘the hero’ just had to vomit when he was sick? where was that dreadfull breaking? he almost died peacefully!
anyway, i’d've gladly bought tickets again if i had to cause the story is yummi [which, of couse a boy and a girl would like for different reasons...] and there’s ed nortons buttocks………there’s really really something ABOUT him
——–been reading room with a view again. i was lying green in bed so it took several days to finish it, which actually was better for understanding. watched the film again. now i’m slandering it all over IMDB…….
i’ve been looking for maurice the book online. nothing there [for free, i mean].
i hate shahriar kobir for his snobbish adventure cum teen romance books. unbearably stupid.offensive, i’d say.
============================================
whenever i go through pride and prejudice [three times so far, i think] i regret the capacity that those people had [ may be not THAT much in reality, still] to observe other people’s behaviour and judge their character and to think over before taking a decision and speaking up…….i wish i could do it even a little bit. i wish i would ‘notice’ how other people act and what they say. of couse i would have been a much better [and loved] freind if i want to selfish and self-centred. i can only think and care about me and about other peoples feelings about me, which is very inaccurate due to my self-centredness . there’s no way to deny that.
i started reading ‘where angles fear to tread’ the e-book because i thought it would be vvery romantic and passionate, bit like lady chatterley, but it’s not. i’ve read 3 chapters and i copied some part of it to send to anandi ar jimi. it’s making the sad, the book is.
””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””
watched history boys.
made me sad, the ending. how people spread over and how their lives take them to different places…..some of them die……..
i wish i was one of the boys. a group that is wise and intelligent, reciting lines from memory, being completely silly at the same time. this is why i liked ‘didimashir jin’. they were bright young students roaming around the baul mela , reciting shakespeare and joydeb……..
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
watched the room with a view. honestly, i expected it to be more passionate. for me it’s just a visualization of important parts of the book now. it couldn’t do justice to the first kiss in poppy field and i didn’t like lucy. goerge was somewhat goodlooking. it was weird to see scudder from maurice to be fred here, but he looked the part. anyway, i was feeling udash (what can be the english for the word?) and i took up pride and prejudice again to go through the conversations of/on darcy and elizabeh…….
last week i read the translation of innocent erendira.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
i’ve been dying to watch Maurice and turns out i wasn’t expcting too much. it had that old english look that i always love, a very handsome hugh grant with another equally beautiful man ( is that a strange word to choose, at least here?! may be it is: doesn’t a man still have a right not to be called beautiful, even when he is gay? any way, i find some men really beautiful. u know, beautiful features, delicate details etc). the film is extremely romantic, it’a heart ranging tragic thing that ends in happily ever after ! plus, not only was there the gay dynamics going on, there also was the class difference thing…sometimes it reminded me of lady chatterley’s loveer, of parts i loved. more accurately, parts that turned the engines in my head start whirring even if i decide not to ‘think’ rignt then. to top it all, there was a lot of male frontal nudity and also, two men kissing and fondling, most importantly, two men in love and forbidden to touch…..it’s a huge turn on!
i thought about the film several times during the day [watched it last night], felt that flutter of heart that i associate with very good and deep romantic movies….it was made in 1985 or 87 and brokeback got oscar. brokeback was a pathetic failed-attempt to depict everything that’s here in maurice.it’s not a gay romantic film, it’s a romantic film and one of the bests of its kind.
and of couse there’s male frontal nudity.